VoxLupus wrote:
If there was any empirical evidence that suggests, that psychics, ghosts, angels, demons, etc. existed, I would be the first to advocate further inquiry into this unknown realm. The fact of the matter is there is no empirical evidence that has been found, not for a lack of trying to obtain it either.
what i keep telling you is that you should not be too quick to believe that there has really been no evidence. consider what such evidence would do the current power structure, that alone should give you an idea to what extent people would go to in order to hide it if it WAS there. i encourage you to expose yourself to media that you know to be propaganda and then think hard and deep about what you have been exposed to your entire life. i'm not saying there is a conspiracy to keep you from the truth, only saying that thinking there cannot be one is rather naive and borders on blatant ignorance.
when lack of evidence is all it takes to convince you that the evidence does not exist you are gullible my friend.
VoxLupus wrote:
There comes a point when after so much time has been spent on subjects like Astrology, Dowsing, Homeopathy, Reflexology, they are all still pretty much the same as they were in the dark ages, there has been no progress in these fields and they never lead to anything new. Furthermore, their connection to reality not even tenuous. They are based on ideas that people just pulled out of their own asses.
again i would urge you to do some looking into these fields yourself before criticizing them and playing them off as something pulled out of an ass.
VoxLupus wrote:
There have been a lot of scientific studies done on these fields, particularly homeopathy, because it is so easy to test in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. They never perform any better than a placebo, this is because they are placebos. This doesn't stop it from being a multi-billion dollar industry.
if you knew something about homeopathy you may be able to distinguish the frauds from the legitimate practitioners. it is really sad that some would abuse peoples ignorance to get money out of the sick, but the pharmaceutical industry has tricked far more money out of sick people than homeopathy could ever hope to.
lol! also if you test a homeopathic remedy for a cold via double blind placebo controlled trials, you would need to test it on clones of a person since each remedy is for a specific persons unique physiology.
VoxLupus wrote:
You make it out like these ideas are being suppressed, but pseudoscience is alarmingly rampant in society, people believe thing for no good reason, usually to a lack of understanding of their own human nature and human psychology (being unaware of placebos for example).
*sigh* what would you do if you can’t stop people from sharing information? you share misinformation... doesn’t take the CIA to figure that out... by the absolute GLUT of prissy ass bulshit about most spiritual subjects it’s almost obvious that these ideas are being suppressed. it’s getting ever harder to sift through all the ridiculous crap to get to anything meaningful, as they disguise it extremely cleverly with wording and well thought out nonsense. i really don’t blame anyone for not believing in some of these supernatural things. but you may find yourself believing in things for no good reason too vox, how many of the facts that construct your beliefs were established by you personally? it may sound silly but think about it, we are biologically prone to trusting and knowledge is power, it just takes one asshole to use science and the understanding of the brain to use it against other people to keep them ignorant. (the fact that this has actually happened numerous times should really be some indication of how easy it is.)
VoxLupus wrote:
Look, I don't really care what you believe personally, but I don't like to see people being mislead and distracted from how beautiful reality actually is. Promotion of these pseudo-scientific beliefs is almost always at the detriment of actual science, and I am sure that if more people pursued studies in real scientific fields, we might actually move further forward as a species, because those other beliefs have done nothing more than hold us back.
ah vox... when will you realize, that is EXACLY how i feel. but ask yourself, what have our current line of scientific inquiry led us? we found new ways to kill each other and our planet. we labor physically and mentally to benefit only a select few. how has that been moving further forward as a species?
VoxLupus wrote:
The truth is actual science is hard. To actually understand quantum physics requires you to have at completed at least a three year course of university level maths in advanced calculus, and that is before you even get to the physics side of things, which is a further several years of study. Siting down and making yourself feel fuzzy inside is easy, it is no surprise that the one produces tangible results and the other doesn't.
but it’s not suppose to be hard! don’t you find it funny how after you spent years studying something the moment you actually understand it you can explain it simply. i have been collecting books from all kinds of time periods and to me it’s obvious that someone wants to make it harder to obtain knowledge. and have you ever tried asking a physicist about physics? O_O most the time they don’t even know what they are on about themselves. this is not due to ideas becoming more complex either. whenever i get stuck on something in physics i just have to switch to an older text book and there it is... same thing just not as burdened by nonsense.
*sigh* both yield tangible results, and I actually find the esoteric a lot harder to understand than science. the difference is that with anything esoteric you have to go physically stuff the proof down someone’s throat for that ONE person to open his mind, where any theoretical physicist can publish a paper about reality blankets and how when 2 collide it creates the universe, in order to get a cult following. O_o and for some reason i seem to be the only one to find that odd and freaking suspicious.
VoxLupus wrote:
You might want to be careful with that, elevated levels of copper in your body is
toxic to humans.
that is why i stopped, i'm working on a way to detect it in other ways at lower concentrations. it’s really hard to study as while it appears gaseous it disperses at a constant rate, even when at high saturation in hermetically sealed containers regardless of light temperature or pressure.
Rakuen Growlithe wrote:
That something is water. Homeopathic dilutions are like single molecules diluted in the ocean. If homeopathy were true then simple tap water would kill you because of the homeopathic doses of poisons and simultaneously cure every known disease. Just take a cup of coffee and keep diluting it and see if it becomes stronger or weaker.
yea, that one confused me at first too. O_O i mean wtf, the original substance is no longer IN the freaking container anymore, it shouldn’t be able to cause the symptoms. and then they go on with the more you dilute it the stronger it gets!? щ(゚Д゚щ)IMPOSIBRU!
yet somehow it does produce the symptoms. so what exactly makes those symptoms? O_O i mean cummawn... how can that not make you curious, how can water cure something? it can’t be placebo effect if the patient never even knew you were treating him... and your question about why you don’t simultaneously die and get your cancer cured from drinking tap water is also really profound. where is the difference?
Rakuen Growlithe wrote:
If you really are interested in learning about alternative medicine I would highly recommend Trick or Treatment which covers acupuncture, homeopathy, chiropractic and one I've forgotten in detail as well as summaries of many others. There are also many relevant chapters in Bad Science.
thanks, i'll give it a read.
Duck face? i thought they were all just making fart noises when posing for pictures...