Public moderation

See room for improvement? Tell us about it! And if you encounter a problem with the board, please let us know.
Post Reply

Which of the proposed initiatives are you in favour of?

Both of them.
2
11%
Only proposal 1
5
28%
Only proposal 2
4
22%
Neither of them
7
39%
 
Total votes: 18
User avatar
Rakuen Growlithe
Fire Puppy
Posts: 6718
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:24 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Bi
Species: Growlithe (pokemon)
Region: Other
Location: Pretoria
Contact:

Public moderation

#1

Post by Rakuen Growlithe »

It's late and I'm a bit tired so bare with me but I want to get this out while I remember. Also note that this is purely for my own thinking. I have not decided upon anything nor have I discussed this with Valerion. That will depend on the votes received here. Basically what I'm considering (and apparently some want) what I will call public moderation with two features.

1) I would create a new moderation subforum. This will be viewable by everyone but only moderators and admins will have posting privileges. It's purpose is to publicly record moderator decisions with one thread per user (created as needed) which records all infractions and punishments. This is the same system that is used on SoFurrry. The idea is that then everyone knows that action has been taken regarding specific users instead of doing it quietly. That is also the negative in that everyone knows action has been taken against people. But it should help clear up confusion and make it clear when things are happening.

2) Thread locks are already (usually) accompanied by a reason. That should continue obviously. I would also consider making a thread as above for deleted threads so that people are aware when things are removed and why they were removed. Making a note of post deletions is also possible but unlike thread locks or deletions, the mention of the deleted content might still lead some to respond to it.

I simply want to know who is in favour of these. Comments are also fine but should not stray off topic.
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~

“Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.”
~John Milton~
User avatar
jacojerb
Posts: 1863
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:04 am
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Gay
Species: bunny/fox
Region: Gauteng
Location: Pretoria east

Re: Public moderation

#2

Post by jacojerb »

I honestly feel this would do more harm than good.

For starters, listing all the drama, even if it isn't described, but only listed, in a single thread, is probably a bad idea. Sure, it's a bit more than just drama, but still.

It's also just not necessary. There isn't enough such things to justify having a subforum just for it
Mew?
User avatar
Sudan Red
Posts: 698
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2016 10:59 am
Gender: Female
Sexual preference: Straight
Species: Lion
Region: Gauteng

Re: Public moderation

#3

Post by Sudan Red »

Status quo - least drama. I don't want to trawl other people's drama & I don't want the humiliation of other people knowing MY drama.
User avatar
Rakuen Growlithe
Fire Puppy
Posts: 6718
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:24 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Bi
Species: Growlithe (pokemon)
Region: Other
Location: Pretoria
Contact:

Re: Public moderation

#4

Post by Rakuen Growlithe »

Those are risks I worry about. It's partly why I've rather kept things private. However, based on what I've heard from some people, there are also users who feel there is not enough information about what happens with regard to moderation and sometimes this leads to falsehoods. For example someone mentioned Tetsudra being banned. However he voluntarily left the forum when he was away for so long and is not currently, nor was he previously, banned.
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~

“Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.”
~John Milton~
User avatar
TheOldWolf
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 10:44 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Gay
Species: Wolf
Region: Gauteng

Re: Public moderation

#5

Post by TheOldWolf »

I feel having a list of infractions on per-user basis is useful for archieval purposes. For newbies like me, it would give me a chance to see where the boundaries are and know what scars to not poke at.
So I support the first option.

The second option, er, no. In my opinion. Just no. If a thread is deleted or hidden because it was deemed against rules and such, seems pointless to then have them in a viewable area. Because their locking\edits should be self explanatory.
Exit light, enter night. My fluffy underbelly is the sky.
User avatar
Splicer-Fox
Posts: 1956
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:38 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Bi
Species: Fox fennec springbok thing
Region: Gauteng
Location: Thailand
Contact:

Re: Public moderation

#6

Post by Splicer-Fox »

Honestly… I do not feel that we need these rules and changes because 1% of the furries on here keep on fighting.
This was normally a problem that fixes itself.
What changed?
What does ZAfur have that they want?
Leeward
Recalcitrant Ruminant
Posts: 7036
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 10:23 pm

Re: Public moderation

#7

Post by Leeward »

I'm all for transparency. I would be in support of both, but I'm concerned that proposal 2 may introduce redundancy/ambiguity with regard to the existing policy regarding taboo and/or illegal subjects. However, considering that I strongly believe said policy to be stupid, if it were to be amended to allow meta-discussion sparked by things mentioned in the deletions thread then I would be satisfied.
User avatar
Faanvolla
Plaas Brak
Posts: 1961
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 12:55 am
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Gay
Species: Dog (Vampire)
Region: Western Cape
Location: Stellenbosch
Contact:

Re: Public moderation

#8

Post by Faanvolla »

Im for both

@ proposal 1
Sudan Red wrote:Status quo - least drama. I don't want to trawl other people's drama & I don't want the humiliation of other people knowing MY drama.
If this is a problem then it could just be made anonymous,
Examples
"User temporary banned for harassment"
"Posts removed for containing gore"

That means everyone who knows who was harassing or posting gore was dealt with, but 4 months later some new person won't immediately judge someone they don't know as a harasser /gore poster, but they will see that both those are not allowed and action will get taken on it
Seize the day, not your bearings.
Steam, Rockstar SocialClub, Uplay, Battlenet: Faanvolla#2539, Telegram: @Faanvolla
Switch Code: SW-0054-4917-1029
DeviantArt,Furaffinity,SoFurry, Weasyl, FurryNetwork
ProfilePic by hanimetion
User avatar
Sev
Superbike Snow Leopard
Posts: 6596
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:27 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Gay
Species: Snow Leopard
Region: Western Cape
Location: A Twisty Road

Re: Public moderation

#9

Post by Sev »

Considering that my "file" would have a fair bit of detail on it, I'm not hugely fond of idea 1 - in all honestly, it actually makes me slightly uncomfortable.

I don't know what it would achieve other than stigmatizing the more controversial users.
User avatar
Rakuen Growlithe
Fire Puppy
Posts: 6718
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:24 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Bi
Species: Growlithe (pokemon)
Region: Other
Location: Pretoria
Contact:

Re: Public moderation

#10

Post by Rakuen Growlithe »

Sev wrote:I don't know what it would achieve other than stigmatizing the more controversial users.
The main goal would be that users are aware when and what actions are taken so they do not think users are breaking rules without any reprimands and so that they don't think users are punished or banned when they have been.
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~

“Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.”
~John Milton~
User avatar
Sev
Superbike Snow Leopard
Posts: 6596
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:27 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Gay
Species: Snow Leopard
Region: Western Cape
Location: A Twisty Road

Re: Public moderation

#11

Post by Sev »

Can't that simply be appended to the offending post?
User avatar
Rakuen Growlithe
Fire Puppy
Posts: 6718
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:24 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Bi
Species: Growlithe (pokemon)
Region: Other
Location: Pretoria
Contact:

Re: Public moderation

#12

Post by Rakuen Growlithe »

Not if the post or thread is deleted. Also it wouldn't inform users unless they read all posts. I'd wager most just read what sounds interesting to them, the same way I use other forums.
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~

“Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.”
~John Milton~
User avatar
Sev
Superbike Snow Leopard
Posts: 6596
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:27 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Gay
Species: Snow Leopard
Region: Western Cape
Location: A Twisty Road

Re: Public moderation

#13

Post by Sev »

So instead, you're proposing implementing what amounts to a wanted poster?
User avatar
Rakuen Growlithe
Fire Puppy
Posts: 6718
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:24 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Bi
Species: Growlithe (pokemon)
Region: Other
Location: Pretoria
Contact:

Re: Public moderation

#14

Post by Rakuen Growlithe »

It's more like a newspaper report than a wanted poster. And I'm not proposing them, I'm gathering information on possible proposals.
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~

“Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.”
~John Milton~
User avatar
Faanvolla
Plaas Brak
Posts: 1961
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 12:55 am
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Gay
Species: Dog (Vampire)
Region: Western Cape
Location: Stellenbosch
Contact:

Re: Public moderation

#15

Post by Faanvolla »

"I dont want people to see I got banned"
Don't do ban worthy things then :P

Making it anonymous with just the message that someone was banned solves that issue anyway.
Seize the day, not your bearings.
Steam, Rockstar SocialClub, Uplay, Battlenet: Faanvolla#2539, Telegram: @Faanvolla
Switch Code: SW-0054-4917-1029
DeviantArt,Furaffinity,SoFurry, Weasyl, FurryNetwork
ProfilePic by hanimetion
User avatar
Sev
Superbike Snow Leopard
Posts: 6596
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:27 pm
Gender: Male
Sexual preference: Gay
Species: Snow Leopard
Region: Western Cape
Location: A Twisty Road

Re: Public moderation

#16

Post by Sev »

Being banned is punishment enough, without the additional humiliation.
User avatar
Galahad
Posts: 1972
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:31 pm
Gender: Male
Region: Gauteng
Location: Pretoria

Re: Public moderation

#17

Post by Galahad »

Proposal number one seems to me to be a double-edged sword, and hence I disagree with it - while it would allow everyone to be aware of the motives behind punishments and disciplinary action, it could be used as a basis to attack the characters of others. Additionally, although one could argue that it is humiliating only when one does something wrong, we are in a community in which the reputations of others have been attacked on numerous occasions (with one such incident currently on-going), and I do not think it wise to give such attackers more ammunition or reason to create drama or controversy. SoFurry is a much larger and more diverse community than ours, and so the reputations of many on such a list are at least partially shielded by others' lack of knowing the punished.

An alternative might be to keep a history of infarctions and punishments, but make it private and viewable only by request from the user (and he or she may only see his or her own record).

Proposal number two is one with which I agree to an extent: Keeping a track record of locked threads seems to me to be somewhat redundant, given that a) the staff member locking generally posts a message explaining why it is being locked, and b) those who would be interested in knowing why it is locked tend mostly to be those viewing the thread and among the first to see the lock message, anyways. Keeping a track record of post deletions, however, seems to me to be a very useful and novel idea, given that these may be more easily missed.
User avatar
Darq
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 4:33 pm
Species: Kitteh =3
Region: Gauteng

Re: Public moderation

#18

Post by Darq »

I'm all for transparency, just a quick rundown of why certain decisions are made. So even if one doesn't understand or agree with a decision, the logic behind it can be followed.

I wouldn't really be in favour of a forum "permanent record" though. Once one has waited out their ban, let them come back with no lingering stigma.

Tacking on a "User has been reprimanded for [this post|<description of deleted post>]." seems to me a good way of doing it. It shows, inline, what behaviour is not tolerated. And it also "fades" with time, so reputations are salvageable.
You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars, you have a right to be here.
Backpackcat. Enby, they / them. Telegram and Twitter: @Darq_At
User avatar
Raven Song
Stealer of Time
Posts: 7039
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:56 pm
Gender: Does it matter?
Sexual preference: Other
Species: Shapeshifting Anubian
Region: Other
Location: Londonium ONce more...
Contact:

Re: Public moderation

#19

Post by Raven Song »

Like the UK furs forum, that has an 18 or something page long thread on banned members :lol:
Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist. Pablo Picasso
User avatar
CyntheWightRabbit
Posts: 281
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:04 pm

Re: Public moderation

#20

Post by CyntheWightRabbit »

I'm going to have to go with neither of them.

Although they do have the potential to be beneficial, I can bet that in the end it won't have the desired effect people are hoping for. The active community here is rather small, and all I can see from either of those is just more fuel for those here to use against one another in their arguments. And isn't that what we're here to stop?
Sarcasm in the lowest form of wit.
Post Reply